Significance Statement
There are two basic and distinct strategies for calculating environmental impacts, the midpoint and endpoint methods in which they have been used in the here-presented study. These strategies are characterized by a paradox of greater relevancy (endpoints) versus greater reliability (midpoints). The lifetime of a construction material has a significant impact on its final score and a small additional investment can potentially increase the lifetime, furthermore it is of the utmost importance to find optimal environmental solutions over the entire lifecycle of a product. Meanwhile, limitations include the higher case of accesses to environmental databases and the lack of reliable data on the size of the material flows. Research into long term effects implies uncertainties in terms of the accuracy of results. It would be interesting for the scientific community to have access to a free environmental database so that this database could be used to establish and compare life cycle assessment methodologies.
For the aforementioned, this study continued the chain of alternatives to reduce extra environmental burdens and to fill the gap which occurred when the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) decided to change the fuel used in Egyptian cement plants (ECP). Furthermore, this study takes the advantages of the international cement industry in how to eliminate environmental burdens. Based on these literature studies and many others, the proposed substitution of using coal instead of the conventional fuel type as an energy source has been investigated. Three different cement production systems have been introduced, two from Egypt and one from Switzerland[1] and were considered for the analysis and comparison. The first was the ECP using electricity, natural gas, diesel and mazzut (a heavy, low quality fuel oil, used in generating plants and similar applications). While the second was an Egyptian hypothetical plant (EHP) operating by using electricity and coal. The third one was a Swiss cement plant[2] (SCP), which is operated using mixed fuels. The main reason behind the comparison between the two Egyptian plants (ECP and EHP) is the fuel feed; electricity, natural gas and coal. The most prevailing form of cement is Portland cement, about 93-97% of which consists of a material called clinker.
Despite a handful of publications have studied many cases about the cement industry in the world using the LCA perspective, there are no such studies relating to the Egyptian cement industry. This problem is attributed to the failure to adopt the EEAA for the LCA as an environmental impact tool, as well as the shortage of the dataset and monitoring tools in the Egyptian firms. Therefore, this study came to shed light on this to fill this gap. To conclude the results obtained during this study, the following information should be pointed out:
The respiratory inorganics, aquatic acidification, global warming (climate change) and non-renewable energy in ECI plants have higher impacts than the ordinary processes by percentages of 35, 60, 35 and 35%, respectively. This is due to the SO2 emissions from the plant chimneys
- during the combustion stage of coal in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
- Based on the difference in the chemical compositions of the fuels used in the oven process, for the SCP, global warming (climate change) and respiratory inorganics (midpoint method) recorded 5% higher adverse impacts than the EHP.
- Considering the endpoint method, the damage to human health of the Egyptian coal based plants (EHP) have been recorded as having higher adverse impacts compared with the other two plants, Egyptian (ECP) and Swiss (SCP).
- The expected damage from the SCP (which uses mixed fuels (is 162 (46%) Eco-points lower than the Egyptian coal based plant, which is a reasonable proportion if it is applied in Egypt.
- A coal based plant has higher adverse environmental impacts compared to others.
- The mitigation of the environmental impact of coal burning using scrubbers must have an important role in the future of ECPs.
Therefore, the consideration of international technologies is highly recommended to mitigate the adverse impacts on the environment in the case of using coal as an alternative feed energy.
Figure Legend 1: Locations of cement factories in Egypt.

Figure Legend 2: International kiln types in the cement industry.

Figure Legend 3: Mass balance of one Kilogram cement

Figure Legend 4: Mid-point method results of the total environmental impacts for the three cases studies comparison.

Figure Legend 5: End-point method results of the three cement plants (The damage assessment approach).

About The Author
Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. Ali, M.Sc. B.Sc. He was born in Assiut, Egypt. He was awarded the bachelor Degree in “Architectural Engineering – Environmental control engineering” with average grade “Excellence with honors” from Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. Ahmed has been awarded the degree of Master of Science in Architectural Engineering (Indoor thermal performance) from Assiut University, Egypt. Ahmed AbdelMonteleb is an Egyptian architect studying for the last 8 years in the field of environmental engineering and the last 3 years in LCA approach applications. He is a Ph.D. student at Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria, Egypt. Nowadays, Ahmed is a visiting researcher at Life Cycle Assessment laboratory, Tokyo City University, Yokohama, Japan from November 2015 till June 2016.
He joined E-JUST in September, 2013 and his research focuses on the Life Cycle Assessment implementation on the Egyptian construction materials (ECMs), as a new environmental tool in Egypt. Establishing the life cycle inventory database of the ECMs and producing the Egyptian sustainable materials are the key targets of his research. All his studies have been carrying out using the attribution and simplified life cycle assessment approach. Currently, he is very keen on the sustainable and green construction materials. A particular focus of his research is on the Cement and brick materials. He has published 20 papers in reputed journals and international conferences.
About The Author
Abdelazim Negm was born in Sharkia, Egypt and has been graduated from Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt and was awarded the B.Sc. Degree in “Civil Engineering – Irrigation and Environmental Engineering”. Negm has been awarded the degree of Master of Science (M.Sc.) in civil Engineering (Irrigation and Hydraulics) from Ain Shams University, Egypt and the PhD degree in Hydraulics on 1992 from Zagazig University.
Currently, he is a professor of Hydraulics in Egypt-Japan University for Science and Technology (E-JUST) since Oct. 1st, 2012 and chairman of the Environmental Engineering Dept. at E-JUST since Feb. 17th, 2013 till 16th March 2016. From 2008 to 2011, he occupied the position of vice dean for Academic and Student Affairs. He published about 300 papers in national and international Journals and conferences. He is listed in (a) Marquis Who is Who?, (b) IBC’s 2000 Outstanding Intellectuals of the 21st Century , and (c) ABI directory for his achievement in the field of Hydraulics and Water Resources. He participated in more than 60 conferences. He has awarded the prizes of best papers three times. His research areas include hydraulic, hydrology and water resources. Currently, he is very interested in the sustainability and green environment and conducted researches and supervising PhD thesis in these fields.
About The Author
Mahmoud Bady has completed his Ph.D. at the age of 35 years from the University of Tokyo, Japan. He is an Assistant Professor for air quality and renewable energy at Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST). He has published more than 20 papers in reputed journals.
About The Author
Mona Gamal Eldin, Professor, Ph.D., M.Sc., She was born in 1959 and she had her basic education at Public Health Sciences, Environmental chemistry and biology.
She has more than 25 years of experience in teaching and research and she held several positions during her professional life; Acting Vice President for Educational and Academic Affairs (EJUST), Dean of School of Energy Resources, Environment and Chemical and Petrochemical Engineering (EJUST), Head of Central Department for west delta region (Ministry of State for Environmental Affairs), Coordinator of Consultant Committee of development and Environment (Bibliotheca Alexandrina). Also she is member of Council of Social Service and Environmental Development Affairs (Alexandria University), Board of director of Alexandria Wastewater Treatment Company.
Journal Reference
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, April 2016, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1053-1068.
Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. Ali , Abdelazim M. Negm, Mahmoud F. Bady, Mona G. E. Ibrahim, Masaaki Suzuki
Environmental Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), New Borg El Arab City, P.O. Box 179, Alexandria, 21934, Egypt
Abstract
Egypt in 2015 announced the alteration of the fuels used in cement plants without the least regard to minimizing the environmental burden (EB) excesses. This study conducts a life-cycle assessment (LCA) of Egyptian cement-manufacturing unit, which is considered as the first one on LCA cement analysis to be conducted in Egypt. This study investigates the LCA of the cement industry in Egypt compared to the Swiss industry, using two methodologies. The first one has been done on-site, surveying the most common types of cement used in the construction industry in Egypt. Meanwhile, SimaPro software has been used to assess the environmental impacts, and three different cement plants were selected for this study: an Egyptian cement plant (ECP) which uses electricity, natural gas, and diesel as energy sources; a Swiss cement plant (SCP) which depends mainly on electricity, natural gas, and coal; and an Egyptian hypothetical plant (EHP) in which electricity and coal are assumed to be the main energy feeds, and comparisons of different strategies including midpoint and endpoint methods are outlined. Regarding the midpoint method, ETP recorded higher respiratory inorganics, aquatic acidification, global warming, and nonrenewable energy impacts than ECP, because of using coal, while for SCP, global warming and respiratory inorganics achieved the highest adverse impacts compared to ECP and EHP—due to the different manufacturing technology used. With regard to the endpoint method, the peak possibility of human health deterioration has been recorded due to the use of coal as fuel. This possibility was reduced by 46 % in the case of SCP as a result of the technology applied, which interestingly represents a reasonable reduction in terms of technological application.
Go To Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Read more research excellence studies on: Renewable Energy Global Innovations (http://ift.tt/21cCPA4)